Williams (2007) states that;
The development of the experience of chemistry from the science of alchemy is a striking face of the complete revolution in the attitude of observers in the land of science.
Kisby (2004) stated that alchemy preceded chemistry and was a branch of inborn philosophy whose goal was to find wealth, longevity and immortality. Alchemists practiceed towards finding something cognise as the Philosophers Stone. It was believed that when this stone was heated and combined with non precious metals, it would run them into gold. In addition to this it was believed that gold could be made into something which could get life indefinitely. The work of alchemists was largely ground on pieceagementfaring principles where it was thought elements could be changed or transmuted by impressing new substances onto them.
It was Robert Boyle (1626-1691), who although had a deep interest in alchemy, began the movement away from that way of working and towards a more empirical way of investigation in science through observation and experiments.
However, the transition from the Alchemists way of working where a preconceived idea of how things should be was held and work was undertaken to try and prove this idea, to the chemists way of working, where ideas and conceptions were based on laboratory experiments, was a lengthy process.
Alchemists believed that anything killed by man could also be revived by him and glowing of substances much(prenominal) as wood, wax and oil was seen as the same as the killing process. It was believed that it was mans limitations that prevented the substance being revived to its former state. Williams (2007) states that alchemists believed that the burning of a metal such as tend, destroyed the lead and left an entirely different substance in its fleck which could be restored to lead. This...If you want to get a full essay, score it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment