Tuesday, October 16, 2012

The Zoo Story by Edward Albee

Therefore, we now have an encounter which appears perfectly constructed for non-communication. Jerry is most likely ready of communicating with Peter, if he could set aside his deviousness and his judgmentalism and his low self-esteem, but possibly he is incapable of setting aside people obstacles to open and trustworthy communication. Jerry says, "But every once inside a whilst I like to talk to somebody, really talk, like to get to know somebody, know all about him" (8). However, Jerry in no way shows any actual want to realize or sympathize with Peter's life or problems, picking to mock him instead and only softening when it seems that Peter might leave.

Peter simply does not appear in a position of communicating, for he has surrendered his openness and perceptiveness to his traditional way of life and philosophy of life. Once again and again, Peter responds to statements from Jerry with phrases of confusion for instance "I must say I don't . . . " (8) and "I didn't mean to seem . . ." (9) and "I . . . Sorry" (10).

However, a larger obstacle to communication exists between the two men. The entire "conversation," from starting to end, is manipulated by Jerry. Though he obviously demands to communicate to another person what he has learned about love, friendship and understanding.
From Jerry's thing of view, communication is manipulation, in this conversation with Peter and in all of life. Jerry hates life, or fears life, or has had adequate of life in any case, and he demands to die, but he isn't in a position or willing to kill himself. Therefore, he decides to use his skills of conversation (or at least what looks to become conversation) to break down Peter's conservative outlook and emotional self-containment to this sort of a factor that he has killed Jerry before he even knows what has happened.

In addition, simply because Jerry is so profoundly conflicted with respect to his parents and his sexuality, he is far from becoming as self-knowing as he believes himself to be. Except for his communication of the dog, which, in recounting, he is trustworthy and honest for possibly the only time within the play, he shows only anger and bitterness. Such anger and bitterness appear the correct type of communication to him, specially compared towards the complacency of Peter. Jerry believes life is really a tragedy and he requirements out, but, again, he doesn't see his very own culpability in generating a life that is so miserable that he would rather die than live.

In a single sense, then, from Jerry's point of view, the communication is perfect--he accomplishes precisely what he needs to accomplish. From Peter's point of view, of course, what has happened to him, how Jerry has manipulated him into murder, will likely not arrive clear to him to your long while, if ever. Jerry has achieved what he wanted in the encounter--death. Peter has no notion what hit him.

I love the dog now, and I wanted him to love me. . . . I don't very know why I expected the dog to understand anything, less my motivations . . . I hoped that the dog would understand. . . . It is just that in case you cannot deal with people, it is advisable to make a start somewhere. WITH ANIMALS! (19).

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.

No comments:

Post a Comment