In many urban areas, blighted areas are acquired by state authorities and past transferred to private redevelopers. In many cases this behavior is unethical because it puts the lamentable at a disadvantage. Instead of governments enacting policies and allocating fu
ds to refurbish impoverished inner-city areas, residents are often forced to relocate as officials find it easier to demolish the area (and its problems) and strain it over to commercial development. Further, by transferring acquisitions to private developers there is the potential drop for corruption in the use of eminent domain.
Favors may be granted to friends, acquaintances or associates of politicians or legislators who wish to develop original areas. This takes advantage of the use of power, the rights of U.S. citizens under the Fifth Amendment and it further separates individuals through the class distinction of wealth.
Eminent Domain Law. Viewed on Aug 8, 2003: hypertext transfer protocol://www.eminentdomainlaw.net, 1-13.
Another ethical issue eminent domain presents has to do with the gap mingled with the unforesightful and the rich. Private developers and government leaders are often wealthy or at least much better off than the poor private property owners in blighted areas. In such cases where government authorities demolish blighted areas to transfer property to private developers, poor property owners are taken advantage of because of the discrepancy between rich and
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment