September 25th

When Mr. Waldman exited his car he today fired a routine into the air, before aiming the gun at Mr. Hunter. When you hold a lade scattergun to somebody's head a few feet from their face, after already firing a round in the air, that equates to appal with a musical composition. Mr. Waldman was in the position of world able to shoot and kill Mr. Hunter at this rase in the confrontation. All witnesses involved in the case play off that the original intent of the meeting was for a one-on-one clenched fist fight to occur between Mr. Waldman and Mr. Hunter. Mr. Waldman claims that he took the stringent calamusgun to the meeting because he was misgivingful he would be shot and killed if he did not. He asserts that his intention was to put fear into the others at the scene, hopefully ending the encounter without violence. However, the defence would buzz off you believe that Mr. Waldman had a right to take a make full firearm to a fist-fight, which he did not. Further, Mr. Waldman was the eldest to produce a firearm, the first to shoot a firearm, and the first to aim a peeved weapon at another individual. Because of these actions it is ludicrous to assume that Mr. Waldman utilise the scattergun in self-defense or fear of his declare safety. Instead, by shooting the firearm into the air and whence pointed the loaded weapon at Mr. Hunter, Mr. Waldman acted as the aggressor in this case.

If Mr. Waldman were sincerely in fear of his life and believed that his personal safety were in jeopardy becau

se others would produce a firearm to the scene of the fight, then he could guard merely negateed being present at the scene. Instead, he took the jurisprudence into his own hands by bringing a loaded firearm to the scene, a firearm which he made the conclusion to fire and aim at another individual. When Mr.

Waldman fired the shotgun into the air and then pointed it at Mr. Hunter, he was guilty of assault with a deadly weapon. Further, his actions put the safety of others in jeopardy, so that when Mr. Alonzo leapt the fence with his own loaded firearm he was playacting in defense of his friend, Mr. Hunter. At this point, Mr. Waldman took the loaded firearm, pointed it at Mr. Sheridan's head, and then fired a round that hit Mr. Sheridan in the torso. The defense has already told you that Mr. Waldman is "not a stupid person" and that he is "a smart person", State v. Waldman, DCA 3d 5678 (Fla. 2003).

A "smart person" does not take a loaded firearm to a fist-fight if he believes others there will have a loaded firearm. Instead, a "smart person" would avoid the scene and contact law enforcement officials if, indeed, he were in fear of his safety. Instead, Mr. Waldman took it upon himself to use a loaded weapon to control the incident, a weapon he fired first, a weapon he first pointed at other individuals, and a w
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.